Website by fretchen

Lecture 4 - Atoms in oscillating fields

In the lecture, we will see how a time dependent coupling allows us to engineer a new Hamiltonian. Most importantly, we will discuss the resonant coupling of two levels and the decay of a single level to a continuum.

In the last lecture, we discussed the properties of two coupled levels. However, we did not elaborate at any stage how such a system might emerge in a true atom. Two fundamental questions come to mind:

  1. How is it that a laser allows to treat two atomic levels of very different energies as if they were degenerate ?

  2. An atom has many energy levels EnE_n and most of them are not degenerate. How can we reduce this complicated structure to a two-level system?

The solution is to resonantly couple two of the atom's levels by applying an external, oscillatory field, which is very nicely discussed in chapter 12 of Ref. 1 2. We will discuss important and fundamental properties of systems with a time-dependent Hamiltonian.

We will discuss a simple model for the atom in the oscillatory field. We can write down the Hamiltonian:

H^=H^0+V^(t). \hat{H} = \hat{H}_0 + \hat{V}(t).

Here, H^0\hat{H}_0 belongs to the atom and V(t)V(t) describes the time-dependent field and its interaction with the atom. We assume that n\left|n\right\rangle is an eigenstate of H^0\hat{H}_0 and write:

H^0n=Enn.\hat{H}_0\left|n\right\rangle = E_n \left|n\right\rangle.

If the system is initially prepared in the state i\left|i\right\rangle, so that

ψ(t=0)=i,\left|\psi(t=0)\right\rangle = \left|i\right\rangle,

what is the probability

Pm(t)=mψ(t)2P_m(t) = \left|\left\langle m|\psi(t)\right\rangle\right|^2

to find the system in the state m\left|m\right\rangle at the time tt?

Evolution Equation

The system ψ(t)\left|\psi(t)\right\rangle can be expressed as follows:

ψ(t)=nγn(t)eiEnt/n,\left|\psi(t)\right\rangle = \sum_n \gamma_n(t) \mathrm{e}^{-i{E_n}t/{\hbar}} \left|n\right\rangle,

where the exponential is the time evolution for H^1= 0\hat{H}_1 =~0. We plug this equation in the Schrödinger equation and get:

in(γ˙n(t)iEnγn(t))eiEnt/n=nγn(t)eiEnt/(H^0+V^)ninγ˙n(t)eiEnt/n=nγn(t)eiEnt/V^ni\hbar \sum_n\left(\dot{\gamma}_n(t)-i\frac{E_n}{\hbar}\gamma_n(t)\right)\mathrm{e}^{-i{E_n}t/{\hbar}}\left|n\right\rangle = \sum_n \gamma_n(t) \mathrm{e}^{-i{E_n}t/{\hbar}}\left(\hat{H}_0 + \hat{V}\right) \left|n\right\rangle\\ \Longleftrightarrow i\hbar\sum_n \dot{\gamma}_n(t) \mathrm{e}^{-i{E_n}t/{\hbar}} \left|n\right\rangle = \sum_n \gamma_n(t) \mathrm{e}^{-i{E_n}t/{\hbar}} \hat{V} \left|n\right\rangle

If we multiply the equation with k\left\langle k\right| we obtain a set of coupled differential equations

iγ˙keiEkt/=nγneEnt/kV^n,iγ˙k=nγnei(EnEk)t/kV^ni\hbar \dot{\gamma}_k \mathrm{e}^{-i{E_k}t/{\hbar}} = \sum_n \gamma_n \mathrm{e}^{-{E_n}t/{\hbar}}\left\langle k\right|\hat{V}\left|n\right\rangle,\\ i\hbar \dot{\gamma}_k = \sum_n \gamma_n \mathrm{e}^{-i {(E_n-E_k)}t/{\hbar}} \left\langle k\right| \hat{V}\left|n\right\rangle

with initial conditions ψ(t=0)\left|\psi(t=0)\right\rangle. They determine the full time evolution.

The solution of this set of equations depends on the details of the system. However, there are a few important points:

  • For short enough times, the dynamics are driving by the coupling strength kV^n\left\langle k\right|\hat{V} \left|n\right\rangle.

  • The right-hand sight will oscillate on time scales of EnEkE_n-E_k and typically average to zero for long times.

  • If the coupling element is an oscillating field eiωLt\propto e^{i\omega_L t}, it might put certain times on resonance and allow us to avoid the averaging effect. It is exactly this effect, which allows us to isolate specific transitions to a very high degree 3

We will now see how the two-state system emerges from these approximations and then set-up the perturbative treatment step-by-step.

Rotating wave approximation

We will now assume that the coupling term in indeed an oscillating field with frequency ωL\omega_L, so it reads:

V^=V^0cos(ωLt)=V^02(eiωlt+eiωlt)\hat{V} = \hat{V}_0 \cos(\omega_Lt) = \frac{\hat{V}_0}{2} \left(e^{i\omega_lt}+e^{-i\omega_lt}\right)

We will further assume the we would like use it to isolate the transition ifi\rightarrow f, which is of frequency ω0=EfEi\hbar \omega_0 = E_f - E_i. The relevant quantity is then the detuning δ=ω0ωL\delta = \omega_0 - \omega_L. If it is much smaller than any other energy difference EnEiE_n-E_i, we directly reduce the system to the following closed system:

iγ˙i=γfeiδtΩiγ˙f=γieiδtΩi\dot{\gamma}_i = \gamma_f \mathrm{e}^{-i \delta t} \Omega\\ i\dot{\gamma}_f = \gamma_i \mathrm{e}^{i \delta t}\Omega^*

Here we defined Ω=iV0^2f\Omega = \left\langle i\right| \frac{\hat{V_0}}{2\hbar}\left|f\right\rangle. And to make it really a time-of the same form as the two-level system from the last lecture, we perform the transformation γf=γ~feiδt\gamma_f = \tilde{\gamma}_f e^{i\delta t}, which reduces the system too:

iγ˙i=Ωγ~fiγ~˙f=δγ~f+Ωγii \dot{\gamma}_i = \Omega \tilde{\gamma}_f \\ i\dot{\tilde{\gamma}}_f = \delta \tilde{\gamma}_f + \Omega^* \gamma_i

This has exactly the form of the two-level system that we studied previously.

Adiabatic elimination

We can now proceed to the quite important case of far detuning, where δΩ\delta \gg \Omega. In this case, the final state f\left|f\right\rangle gets barely populated and the time evolution can be approximated to to be zero [@lukin].

γ~˙f=0\dot{\tilde{\gamma}}_f = 0

We can use this equation to eliminate γ\gamma from the time evolution of the ground state. This approximation is known as adiabatic elimination:

γ~f=Ωδγiiγ˙i=Ω2δγ~i\tilde{\gamma}_f = \frac{\Omega^*}{\delta}\gamma_i\\ \Rightarrow i\hbar \dot{\gamma}_i = \frac{|\Omega|^2}{\delta} \tilde{\gamma}_i

The last equation described the evolution of the initial state with an energy Ei=Ω2δE_i = \frac{|\Omega|^2}{\delta}. If the Rabi coupling is created through an oscillating electric field, i.e. a laser, this is know as the light shift or the optical dipole potential. It is this concept that underlies the optical tweezer for which Arthur Ashkin got the nobel prize in the 2018.

Example: Atomic clocks in optical tweezers

A neat example that ties the previous concepts together is the recent paper. The experimental setup is visualized in the figure below.

While nice examples these clocks are still far away from the best clocks out there, which are based on optical lattice clocks and ions.

Perturbative Solution

The more formal student might wonder at which points all these rather hefty approximation are actually valid, which is obviously a very substantial question. So, we will now try to isolate the most important contributions to the complicated system through perturbation theory. For that we will assume that we can write:

V^(t)=λH^1(t)\hat{V}(t) =\lambda \hat{H}_1(t)

, where λ\lambda is a small parameter. In other words we assume that the initial system H^0\hat{H}_0 is only weakly perturbed. Having identified the small parameter λ\lambda, we make the perturbative ansatz

γn(t)=γn(0)+λγn(1)+λ2γn(2)+ \gamma_n(t) = \gamma_n^{(0)} + \lambda \gamma_n^{(1)} + \lambda^2 \gamma_n^{(2)} + \cdots

and plug this ansatz in the evolution equations and sort them by terms of equal power in λ\lambda.

The 00th order reads

iγ˙k(0)=0. i\hbar \dot{\gamma}_k^{(0)} = 0.

The 00th order does not have a time evolution since we prepared it in an eigenstate of H^0\hat{H}_0. Any evolution arises due the coupling, which is at least of order λ\lambda.

So, for the 11st order we get

iγ˙k(1)=nγn(0)ei(EnEk)t/kH^1n. i\hbar \dot{\gamma}_k^{(1)} = \sum_n \gamma_n^{(0)} \mathrm{e}^{-i(E_n-E_k)t/{\hbar}}\left\langle k\right|\hat{H}_1\left|n\right\rangle.

First Order Solution (Born Approximation)

For the initial conditions ψ(t=0)=i\psi(t=0)=\left|i\right\rangle we get

γk(0)(t)=δik.\gamma_k^{(0)}(t) = \delta_{ik}.

We plug this in the 11st order approximation and obtain the rate for the system to go to the final state f\left|f\right\rangle:

iγ˙(1)=ei(EfEi)t/fH^1ii \hbar\dot{\gamma}^{(1)} = \mathrm{e}^{i(E_f-E_i)t/{\hbar}} \left\langle f\right|\hat{H}_1 \left|i\right\rangle

Integration with γf(1)(t=0)=0\gamma_f^{(1)}(t=0) = 0 yields

γf(1)=1i0tei(EfEi)t/fH^1(t)i ⁣dt, \gamma_f^{(1)} = \frac{1}{i\hbar}\int\limits_0^t \mathrm{e}^{i(E_f-E_i)t'/{\hbar}} \left\langle f\right| \hat{H}_1(t')\left|i\right\rangle \mathop{}\!\mathrm{d}t',

so that we obtain the probability for ending up in the final state:

Pif(t)=λ2γf(1)(t)2.P_{i\to f}(t) = \lambda^2\left| \gamma_f^{(1)}(t)\right|^2.

Note that Pif(t)1P_{i\to f}(t) \ll 1 is the condition for this approximation to be valid!

Example 1: Constant Perturbation.

Sketch of a constant perturbation.

We apply a constant perturbation in the time interval [0,T]\left[0,T\right], as shown in above. If we use the expression for γf(1)\gamma_f^{(1)} and set ω0=EfEi\hbar \omega_0 = E_f-E_i, we get

γf(1)(tT)=1ifH^1ieiω0T1iω0,\gamma_f^{(1)}(t\geq T) = \frac{1}{i \hbar} \left\langle f\right|\hat{H}_1\left|i\right\rangle \frac{\mathrm{e}^{i\omega_0 T}-1}{i\omega_0},

and therefore

Pif=12fV^i2sin2(ω0T2)(ω02)2y(ω0,T).P_{i\to f} = \frac{1}{\hbar^2}\left|\left\langle f\right|\hat{V}\left|i\right\rangle\right|^2 \underbrace{\frac{\sin^2\left(\omega_0\frac{T}{2}\right)}{\left(\frac{\omega_0}{2}\right)^2}}_{\mathrm{y}(\omega_0,T)}.

A sketch of y(ω0,T)\mathrm{y}(\omega_0,T) is shown below

A sketch of y

We can push this calculation to the extreme case of TT\rightarrow \infty. This results in a delta function, which is peaked round ω0=0\omega_0 = 0 and we can write:

Pif=T2π2fV^i2δ(ω0)P_{i\to f} = T\frac{2\pi}{\hbar^2}\left|\left\langle f\right|\hat{V}\left|i\right\rangle\right|^2\delta(\omega_0)

This is the celebrated Fermi's golden rule.

Example 2: Sinusoidal Perturbation. For the perturbation

H^1(t)={H^1eiωtfor  0<t<T0otherwise\hat{H}_1(t) = \left\{ \begin{array}{ccl} \hat{H}_1\mathrm{e}^{-i\omega t} && \text{for}\; 0 < t < T \\ 0 &&\text{otherwise}\end{array} \right.

we obtain the probability

Pif(tT)=12fV^i2y(ω0ω,T).P_{i\to f} (t \geq T) = \frac{1}{\hbar^2} \left|\left\langle f\right|\hat{V}\left|i\right\rangle\right|^2 \mathrm{y}(\omega_0 - \omega, T).

At ω=EfEi/\omega = \left|E_f - E_i\right|/\hbar we are on resonance.

In the fifth lecture, we will start to dive into the hydrogen atom.

Footnotes

  1. Jean Dalibard Jean-Louis Basdevant. Quantum Mechanics. Springer-Verlag, 2002.

  2. Claude Cohen-Tannoudji, Jacques Dupont-Roc, Gilbert Grynberg. Atom-Photon Interactions. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, 1998.

  3. This is the idea behind atomic and optical clocks, which work nowadays at 101810^{-18}.